Showing posts with label Evolutionary Psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evolutionary Psychology. Show all posts

The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature

Quick Thoughts:
  1. I really enjoyed this book.  Matt Ridley is an entertaining author.
  2. The book starts by getting into evolution from a pretty hard-core biological perspective.  I have to admit, many of the concepts and terminology were outside of my everyday understand (It's been a long time since I took a Biology class - close to 25 years).  But, he makes it pretty easy to keep pace and at least walk-away with the main points of what he is talking about.
  3. One of his fundamental questions is why people (animals) use sex to reproduce.  This sounds like a simple question.  He shows that it's not.  He starts back in history and gets into the thinking of people trying to answer the question.  He shows plenty of evidence which backs up their answer to the question (often to the point where you think he's presenting THE answer).  Then he blasts their thinking with evidence that runs directly counter to their theories.  He slowly moves forward in time and does it again to other scientific thinkers.  By the time he reaches today, you have a real understanding as to why the answer to this basic question is so difficult to answer.  And in working his way through this scientific history, you get a sense for how people have gone about using experimentation and evidence to answer a very basic scientific question.
  4. Eventually he gets to his theories on human nature, which are basically those of an Evolutionary Psychologist.  Put basically, he sees men and women as having fundamentally different reproductive strategies.  Males have the capacity to spread their genetic code widely with many sexual partners.  Often in history, we have seen that remarkable wealthy, powerful men will take on many, many wives and have many, many children.  Females, on the other hand, are more limited in their total potential number of off-spring, and generally require male help in order to successfully raise her children.  A female can attract a husband, but reproduce with a different, higher status male without her husband noticing.  There are times that pursuing such a strategy gives her offspring the best chances for success.  Despite these differing strategies and conflicting interests, most of the time human society is monogamous.
  5. The previous paragraph isn't doing full justice to his ideas.  The author uses plenty of examples which show how unusual our particular mating habits are.  Then he goes to great lengths to show how we might have evolved the way we did.  It's pretty cool when he shows how aspects of our mating patterns are pretty similar to a specific bird or primate.  Finally, he takes these ideas and explains how you can see them playing out in current day society.  It's a fun ride. 
  6. What's great is that the author is convincing and does a great job of using specific evidence to back-up and challenge his points.  If you like non-fiction, sex, and evolution, then this is hard book to put down.

Amazon

    Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters: From Dating, Shopping, and Praying to Going to War and Becoming a Billionaire-- Two Evolutionary Psychologists Explain Why We Do What We Do

    Quick Thoughts
    1. The writers bit off more than they could chew.
    2. The studies in are very interesting, as are the explanations that the authors come up with.  It's not too long into the book that you 'get' their idea.  Men and woman are different because of the possible number of children they can potentially have. Men can have 'thousands' and woman can have a few dozen.  Every conclusion they come from stems from this simple fact.  Unfortunately, it just seems too simple to really explain behavior.
    3. That said, it's neat when you read that every problem comes back to sex.  And sometimes they are convincing.  Other times they are ridiculous.  Its most amusing when they say their theory has 'answered' a bunch of question they posed against it, concluding that alternative views are incorrect.
    4. The writing style leaves a little to be desired.  They claim that most social scientists believe that all human behavior is due to culture (meaning that changing culture can 'fix' problems).  Then they use that claim as a straw man to knock over in order to build up their perspective.  Weak.
    5. I will call it a fun read.  Great if you like to read critically.  Because you'll find lots to be critical about while picking up the studies they site.  Enjoyable.
    Amazon